"Children are picking up the caring roles the state has abandoned," The Guardian says, while The Independent says that 180,000 children work as unpaid carers.

These new figures come from the Office for National Statistics, which has pulled together data on unpaid care in England and Wales from the 2011 census.

The census (which has been carried out every 10 years since the middle of the nineteenth century) reveals an increase in the proportion of the population who are providing unpaid care.

This has risen from 11.5% in 2001 to 11.9% in 2011 in women, and from 8.8% to 9% in men. There tend to be more female carers than male, with the highest burden of care falling on the 50-64 age group for both sexes.

A related report produced by the charity The Children’s Society – based on the same data – has highlighted the issue of children acting as unpaid carers.

The charity's report describes how the census data estimated that there are around 160,000 unpaid young carers in England. It goes on to explain that this is likely to be an underestimate.

 

What does the ONS find about the gender of carers?

Just over half (58%) of the 5.41 million people providing some level of unpaid care in England are female and 42% are male. This higher proportion of female carers is consistent across all regions. Female carers are representative of 11.9% of the total female population of England and Wales, and male carers are representative of 9% of the male population. Ten years ago these figures were 11.5% and 8.8%.

The level of care provided was most often between one and 19 hours a week. However, 2.9% of the female population and 2% of the male population provided 50 or more hours of care a week. In 2011 in England, 9.5% of the male working population and 13.3% of the female working population were also providing some level of unpaid care. In England, 1.2% of the female population and 1% of the male population were in full-time employment at the same time as providing 50 or more hours of unpaid care. If you are a working carer, read the NHS Choices advice on combining caring with working or studying.

Links To The Headlines

180,000 children work as unpaid carers for relatives. The Independent, May 16 2013

Carers putting their own health at risk, census shows. The Daily Telegraph, May 16 2013

Children are picking up the caring roles the state has abandoned. The Guardian, May 16 2013

Young carers: Quarter of a million children provide care for others. BBC News, May 16 2013

“IVF advance triples couples' chances of having a baby”, The Daily Telegraph reports.

The innovation in question is actually based on an old imaging technique called time-lapse photography, where a camera is set to record a series of images at regular intervals. This technology is now available for monitoring the development of IVF embryos before they are transferred into the womb.

The researchers in this study developed a way of using the information collected to identify which embryos had a low or high chance of having an abnormal number of chromosomes (called aneuploidy). Aneuploidy can reduce the chances of embryos successfully implanting and resulting in a healthy live birth.

In this study, the researchers looked back at time-lapse imaging for embryos from 69 couples who had IVF. They wanted to know if their technique correctly identified embryos which were more likely to result in a pregnancy or live birth.

The time-lapse cameras allowed the researchers to potentially ‘screen’ embryos for risk of aneuploidy. From this, they would then be able to choose the low risk embryos for implantation.

The researchers found that 73% of the embryos their assessment would have classed as low risk resulted in a pregnancy at five to six weeks, and 61% resulted in a live birth. These rates were higher compared to the overall rate for all embryos (at any risk level), where the pregnancy rate was 42% and the live birth rate was 39%. However, it is important to restate that the new system was not used to intervene, so the results are based purely on observation.

While the results are promising, the technique is still in its early stages. Further research is needed to more widely test the technique and directly compare its results to standard methods.

 

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from CARE Fertility, an independent provider of fertility treatment and related services in the UK and Ireland. No sources of financial support were reported and the authors reported that they had no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed medical journal, Reproductive Biomedicine Online.

The study was well reported in the media, with BBC News coverage including an informative video to explain the technique.

However, potentially confusing figures are reported in other parts of the media.

The Times reported that the new technique “could give a 78% chance of success” while the Daily Mail reports that “Early trials show 78% of women having the test will have a healthy baby”.

The Guardian’s reporting suggests that “Doctors in Nottingham who devised the procedure say it could raise live birthrates at their clinic to 78%...” and this may be where this figure has come from.

However, this 78% figure does not come from the research paper itself, which reports that 61% of the low risk embryos successfully resulted in a live birth – not 78%.

 

What kind of research was this?

This study looked at whether the novel technique based on time-lapse images of IVF embryos might help select the embryos most likely to successfully produce a baby.

Until now, the researchers say that the vital decision about which IVF embryo should be selected and transferred into the mother’s womb is mainly based on between two and six observations of the developing embryo under the microscope.

To observe the embryo’s development, doctors have had to remove the culture dish containing the embryos from the very controlled environment of the incubator and place them under a microscope in the ambient air of the laboratory. This is usually only performed once a day to minimise disturbance to the embryo.

The authors of the study report that a major reason for IVF failure and miscarriage is that the implanted embryo has an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidy). To accurately detect any chromosomal abnormality requires an invasive biopsy of the developing embryo, followed by genetic testing.

Currently it is not possible to reliably identify those embryos with an increased chance of aneuploidy with the normal microscopic observations of the embryo.

The current study tested a way of identifying the embryos at low risk of having abnormal numbers of chromosomal, using time-lapse imaging of the embryo. A relatively new system now allows doctors to obtain a stream of thousands of microscopic images of developing embryos (time-lapse images), without having to remove embryos from the incubator.

Using this system, the researchers previously found that embryos with an abnormal number of chromosomes take a different length of time to reach certain developmental stages than normal embryos. Based on this, they developed a method to identify those embryos at low, medium, and high risk of having an abnormal number of chromosomes.

In their current study, the researchers looked back at the results of IVF procedures where the embryos had been assessed using time-lapse imaging. They wanted to see if their method could identify those embryos which were more likely to go on to successfully implant, develop and be born.

It is important to note that the study did not actually use the method to select embryos for implantation – it only looked at what might have happened if the method had been used.

This is an appropriate first step for this type of research and, if the results are promising, the method would need to go on to be tested “for real” to select embryos, to see if it performed better than standard methods.

 

What did the research involve?

This study looked at the treatment outcomes for 88 embryos from 69 couples who attended the CARE Fertility clinic in Manchester between April 2011 and December 2012, and who had a known outcome from their IVF.

This meant that they knew if transfer of the embryo(s) had resulted in:

• failed implantation – where the woman had a negative pregnancy test
• clinical pregnancy – defined as the presence of a developing embryo with a heart beat at between six and eight weeks of pregnancy
• a live birth – identified through the mother completing a clinic delivery outcome form, which according to regulations is reported to the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority

The researchers excluded cases where two embryos were implanted but did not both have the same outcome, as they would not be able to tell which embryo had which outcome.

The egg cells collected from the women had been fertilised using intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), where a single sperm is injected directly into the egg. The fertilised eggs were then placed into the time-lapse incubator for culturing and imaging for five to six days.

The inbuilt microscope took images of the fertilised egg cell every 20 minutes. The image-analysis software recorded the precise timing of developmental events as they occurred. The embryos had been selected using standard existing methods before being transferred into the womb (that is, not using the new risk assessment method).

The researchers used this previously collected data model to assess the embryos, and grade whether the embryos were at low, medium or high risk of having an abnormal number of chromosomes. They then looked at what proportion of each of these three groups of embryos had achieved clinical pregnancy and live birth, and if this differed between the groups.

 

What were the basic results?

The researchers found that of the 88 embryos they assessed, 33 were at low risk for having an abnormal number of chromosomes, 51 at medium risk, and four at high risk.

Overall, 42% of the embryos successfully implanted and had a fetal heart beat at five to six weeks.

Among the low risk embryos, almost three-quarters (73%) successfully implanted and had a fetal heart beat at five to six weeks, compared to a quarter (25.5%) of medium risk embryos and no high risk embryos.

This meant that the 73% figure for low risk embryos is a relative increase of 74% compared with the rate for all embryos (42%) – what the media has translated as a ‘74% chance of successful pregnancy’.

The researchers had data on whether or not women had a live birth for 46 of the embryos (18 low risk, 26 medium risk, two high risk). The rest of the pregnancies had not reached term during the study period.

Overall, 39% of the embryo transfers resulted in a live birth. Among the low risk embryos, 61% resulted in a live birth. Among medium risk embryos, 19% resulted in live birth. None of the high risk embryos resulted in a live birth.

Therefore, the 61% figure for low risk embryos is a relative risk increase of 56% compared with the rate for all embryos (39%) – this is where media reports of the ‘increasing live birth rates to above 50%’ come from.

 

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers say that their risk classification model using time-lapse imaging introduces a non-invasive way of selecting the embryos that are at a low risk of having an abnormal number of chromosomes. They say that this can result in higher likelihood of successful pregnancy and live birth.

 

Conclusion

This study reports on a new technique using ‘time-lapse imaging’ to non-invasively identify the IVF embryos least likely to have abnormal numbers of chromosomes.

An embryo having an abnormal number of chromosomes is one of the reasons IVF can be unsuccessful.

By looking back at the results of previous IVF procedures, the study showed that embryos identified as being low risk using the new method were the most likely to result in a live birth.

To date, IVF techniques rely on removing the embryo from the incubator about once daily over the course of five to six days to view its development under the microscope. As such, current methods only allow for a few static images which cannot give a reliable indication of whether an embryo has chromosome abnormalities, and also disturb the developing embryo. To select the best embryo for implantation, biopsies of the embryo have to be taken to examine the genes. The new technique potentially offers a non-invasive way to assess the risk of chromosome abnormality using detailed time-lapse images.

The results of this study are promising, but there are some limitations:

• It only assessed the outcomes for only 69 couples who received care at one fertility service. Larger numbers of embryos would ideally need to be assessed to confirm the results. Ideally, prospective studies comparing this new technique with standard techniques would also be carried out.
• The researchers note that their methods and results may not be directly transferable to other laboratories or other types of patient populations. 

The technique, while potentially promising, is still in an early stage of development. 

Analysis by Bazian. Edited by NHS Choices. Follow Behind the Headlines on Twitter.

Links To The Headlines

IVF could be revolutionised by new technique, says clinic. The Guardian, May 17 2013

'Most exciting breakthrough in IVF treatment in 30 years' could triple number of births. The Independent, May 17 2013

IVF advance triples couples' chances of having a baby. The Daily Telegraph, May 17 2013

IVF test that 'trebles the chance of a baby': Photo method helps doctors implant best embryo. Daily Mail, May 17 2013

IVF 'may be boosted by time-lapse embryo imaging'. BBC News, May 17 2013

New IVF Technique Could Triple Number Of Births. Sky News, May 17 2013

IVF time lapse photographing technique breakthrough could help avoid miscarriages and triple number of births. Daily Mirror, May 17 2013

New IVF technique using time-lapse photos to increase number of healthy births. Metro, May 17 2013

Links To Science

Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, et al. Retrospective analysis of outcomes after IVF using an aneuploidy risk model derived from time-lapse imaging without PGS. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. Published online May 13 2013

 

“Study shows girls with absent fathers more likely to develop depression," the Mail Online has revealed.

It reports on a large UK study that found that girls whose biological fathers were absent during the first five years of their childhood had an increased risk of symptoms of depression. No increase in risk was found for girls whose fathers were absent later in childhood, and no increase in risk was found for boys with absent fathers.

Researchers collected information regarding the physical absence of the biological father during childhood, as well as information on depression symptoms when the child was 14. They assessed whether there was any association between these factors.

During their analysis, the researchers took into account several factors that may influence the link, such as family characteristics. However, despite the researchers' efforts to take these variables into account, the reasons why a father may be absent from the family home can be incredibly complicated. This means we can’t be sure whether other factors have produced the association between absent fathers and depression in girls.

 

Where did the story come from?

The study was carried out by researchers from the University of Bristol and was funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the University of Bristol.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed journal Psychological Medicine.

Media coverage of this research was broadly accurate, though neither ITV nor Mail Online outlined any of the study’s limitations.

 

What kind of research was this?

This was an analysis of data from a prospective cohort study called the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. This is a study that has been ongoing since the 1990s that assesses influences on the health and development of children.

The researchers were interested in the potential link between the absence of the biological father in early childhood and the risk of mental health problems. They were specifically interested in symptoms of depression that were not necessarily severe enough to be considered clinical depression.

As a prospective cohort study, this research is less likely to be affected by certain types of bias, especially recall bias. It was important that the researchers collected data on the effect of family factors on the children’s mental health at the time, rather than at a later date, to help ensure the information was accurate. Prospective studies allow for this.

 

What did the research involve?

The researchers measured two main factors:

• absence of the biological father during childhood
• experience of depressive symptoms during the teenage years

To measure parental absence, the researchers used questionnaires, filled out by the children’s mothers regularly throughout the children’s lives. These questionnaires asked whether the ‘present live-in father-figure is the natural father of the child and, if not, how old the child was when the natural father stopped living with the family’. This information was used to divide the children into three groups:

• biological father present
• biological father not present during the first five years of life (during early childhood)
• biological father not present from age 5 to 10 (during middle childhood)

To assess the teenagers’ experiences of depressive symptoms, the researchers asked the study participants to complete a 13-item questionnaire when they were approximately 14 years old. This asked about the presence of certain symptoms over the previous two weeks. The questionnaire is reported to be a reliable and valid measure of depression in children. Children scoring 11 or higher on this questionnaire were considered to have high levels of depressive symptoms. This is not the same as being diagnosed with depression, however.

The researchers then analysed the data, comparing the risk of having high levels of depressive symptoms among children whose biological father left during early or middle childhood to the risk in children whose fathers were still living with them. These analyses were adjusted for several factors (confounders) that could be linked to both the absence of the father and depressive symptoms, including:

• socioeconomic status (including home or car ownership, major financial problems, family size and parents’ jobs)
• mother’s characteristics (including having a child before the age of 20, experiencing depression during pregnancy), and
• any parental conflict between the mother and her current partner

Separate analyses were carried out for boys and girls, to determine whether the child’s gender had any impact on the relationship between father’s absence and depressive risk.

 

What were the basic results?

There were approximately 14,500 children in the original cohort study, approximately 11,000 of whom had data available on the presence or absence of their biological father. Among these children, approximately 6,000 had available data regarding depressive symptoms at age 14.

Overall, girls reported higher levels of depressive symptoms than boys, regardless of whether their father lived with them or not – a trend that has also been found in previous studies.

Girls

The study included:

• 374 girls whose father left during early childhood, 87 (23.3%) of whom had high depressive symptoms at age 14
• 193 girls whose father left during middle childhood, 27 (14.0%) of whom had high depressive symptoms at age 14
• 2,295 girls whose father was present throughout childhood, 332 (14.5%) of whom had high depressive symptoms at age 14

Boys

The study included:

• 357 boys whose father left during early childhood, 30 (8.4%) of whom had high depressive symptoms at age 14
• 185 boys whose father left during middle childhood, 17 (9.2%) of whom had high depressive symptoms at age 14
• 2,227 boys whose father was present throughout childhood, 166 (7.4%) of whom had high depressive symptoms at age 14

When assessing the association between the absence of the father in early childhood and teenage depressive symptoms, researchers found that:

• Girls with absent fathers during early childhood had a 53% greater chance of experiencing high levels of depressive symptoms compared with girls with fathers present during this time (odds ratio  [OR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07 to 2.21).
• Boys with absent fathers were no more likely to report high levels of depressive symptoms at age 14 than boys whose fathers were present during early childhood (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.79).

There was no significant association between middle childhood father absence and teenage depressive symptoms.

 

How did the researchers interpret the results?

The researchers concluded that “father absence in early childhood increases risk for adolescent depressive symptoms, particularly in girls”.

 

Conclusion

This large prospective cohort study suggests that there is a link between a father’s absence during the first few years of life and a girl’s risk of experiencing depressive symptoms.

This study has several strengths, including its large sample size, its long-term follow-up and prospective collection of data for the analyses. It also attempted to consider confounding variables during the analysis and was based in the UK, which helps to ensure that the results are applicable here.

There are some limitations, however, that should be taken into account, including the following.

• Only a third of the original cohort was analysed due to missing data on key factors. It is unclear to what extent those included differed from the entire population-based cohort. The researchers report that drop-outs were more likely among participants in lower socioeconomic groups. This factor is linked to both parental absence and depressive symptoms, so it could reduce the validity of the results and how much we can infer from them.
• The adjusted analyses further reduced the available sample size due to missing data on confounding factors, and the researchers suggest that this may have resulted in loss of statistical power to detect an effect.
• Several potential confounders were not included in the analysis, and could have influenced the results. The study authors report some of these potential confounders (quality of parent-child relationship, the father’s involvement in the child’s life regardless of whether he lived in the same house).
• The questionnaire used to assess depressive symptoms is not a measure of clinical depression. A high score on this questionnaire does not indicate that the child has or will develop a diagnosable depressive disorder.

Overall, this study suggests that early childhood family environments may play an important role in the mental health of children. At this stage we don’t know what accounts for the study’s results, and the researchers say that this should inspire future research into the possible biological and psychological mechanisms underpinning this relationship.

Depression is one of the most common mental health conditions, yet there is very little good quality evidence about how to prevent people developing depression. Research that gives us insight into the factors that increase children’s likelihood of developing depression would be invaluable.

Analysis by Bazian. Edited by NHS Choices. Follow Behind the Headlines on Twitter.

Links To The Headlines

A quarter of young girls with absent fathers 'grow into depressed teenagers': Researchers say boys cope better with parental separation. Mail Online, May 15 2013

Study shows girls with absent fathers more likely to develop depression. ITV News, May 15 2013

Links To Science

Culpin I, Heron J, Araya R, et al. Father absence and depressive symptoms in adolescence: findings from a UK cohort. Psychological Medicine. Published online May 14 2013